Skip Navigation


Journal of Conflict and Security Law Advance Access originally published online on August 22, 2008
Journal of Conflict and Security Law 2008 13(1):25-32; doi:10.1093/jcsl/krn016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/1/25    most recent
krn016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gazzini, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2008; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A Response to Amos Guiora: Pre-Emptive Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors?

Tarcisio Gazzini*

* Faculty of Law, VU University, Amsterdam.

Correspondence: E-mail: T.Gazzini{at}rechten.vu.nl.


  Abstract

In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emptive self-defence in the context of international terrorism. He further argues that Article 51 as it is currently interpreted and the relevant rules on State responsibility provide an adequate legal protection to States. The response also addresses the question of judicial review by national courts over the executive's decision to resort to military force.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.