Skip Navigation


Journal of Conflict and Security Law Advance Access originally published online on February 19, 2008
Journal of Conflict and Security Law 2007 12(3):419-445; doi:10.1093/jcsl/krn001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/3/419    most recent
krn001v3
krn001v2
krn001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2008; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Definition of Non-International Armed Conflict in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: An Analysis of the Threshold of Application Contained in Article 8(2)(f)

Anthony Cullen*

* Research Fellow, BRCS/ICRC Customary International Humanitarian Law Project, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence: E-mail: atc30{at}cam.ac.uk


   Abstract

This article puts forward an argument for a particular approach to the interpretation of the definition of non-international armed conflict in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Focusing on the meaning of Article 8(2)(f), it is contended that this provision possesses a threshold of an application equivalent to that of Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949. In supporting this position, the first half of the article analyses the travaux preparatoires of the Rome Statute. Here relevant clauses relating to non-international armed conflict are analysed in order to highlight the threshold of application intended by their drafters. Following on from the travaux preparatoires of the Rome Statute, the second half of the article puts forward an interpretation of the threshold contained in Article 8(2)(f) as one applicable to all situations of non-international armed conflict subject to the court's jurisdiction. Drawing, among other things, on the conventional usage of the term ‘armed conflict not of an international character’ and the customary status of non-international armed conflict provisions in the Rome Statute, an argument is advanced for an understanding of the threshold contained in Article 8(2)(f) as the one identical to that of common Article 3.


The opinions herein are those of the author alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the British Red Cross Society or the International Committee of the Red Cross. The author would like to thank Dr. Shane Darcy, Dr. Paul Downes, Professor William Schabas and Ms. Ruby Carmen for their comments on early drafts of this paper.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.