Skip Navigation

Journal of Conflict and Security Law 2005 10(2):263-277; doi:10.1093/jcsl/kri011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahinden, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The Future of Arms Control Law: Towards a New Regulatory Approach and New Regulatory Techniques

Erwin Dahinden1

1 Dr. Erwin Dahinden, Rapporteur of the Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament Law of the International Law Association.

Regulatory approaches and techniques will become an important focus of future arms control efforts. This article identifies its main elements and illustrates this recent development on the basis of current multilateral arms control negotiations. It shows that this new approach is very resilient to changing political developments, has a strong preventive component and is crisis resistant. Furthermore, the success of the new regulatory approach is closely linked to an effective implementation of the agreements whether they are politically or legally binding. The emphasis is no longer on intrusive international verifications or diplomatic high-level conferences but on the ability and capability of each state to effectively implement the concluded agreements. Success is no longer measured in terms of the number of ratifications but on the basis of the effectiveness and thoroughness of national implementation efforts. Because national implementation is an important element, the new approach can more effectively deal with the non-state actors than traditional arms control approaches. In addition, if necessary, the international community should provide technical, legal and financial assistance to promote implementation in less developed countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.